160 thoughts on “Go Time! YAY! Canadiens at Rangers.”

  5. Interesting situation tonight. It can be argued that if we win we’ll wanna start losing a few, & if we lose we’ll wanna get back to winning.

    Like

  25. Nude post? Re-posting: what Fast did on that goal is what The and Nash should do every shift. Nice hit earlier, too, and a great start and finish by Oscar!

    Like

  30. I would argue, Cyprinus, that the Rangers, with their defensive depth, do not have the same problems other Ds have. No stars, but a good rotation.

    Like

  64. It was worth to try to soot for HZ anyway… Gallagher kreidered Hank, probably because of false sense of moral appropriation. Will it be any consequences? I don’t think so.

    Like

  79. Rangers could get either of three result since tonight, but playing a solid game. No passengers. Couple of weak goals by Hank, far more excellent saves.

    Like

  91. Great game, great point. Would have been, still would be great to get both points, but zero was in the cards. Strong game. Now for the 33ATGHE.

    Like

  93. Does anyone know how many PP goals and assists Stephan has this year? I can’t understand why he is out for PP. Refuses to shoot and too slow to get to loose pucks.

    Like

  120. Rangers have to face SOMEBODY. If you don’t want to face Pitt or Washington or Columbus and now Montreal is to be avoided, well, there’s not much left.

    Like

  130. Can’t understand Nash being so low on the SO order. Oh well, IMO it was the best game we lost this year. I don’t think that Grabs & Hayes got more than 1 OT shift. It also seems like that was only our 3rd or 4th Shootout of the year. Could that be right ?

    Like

  133. From what I see of Brady Shay and from his live interviews, I now get the distinct impression that he is one of those kids who thrives on positive input and grows in confidence with complements. Hate to say it, but he is one of those type of players that Torts would stymie and AV helps.

    Like

  135. Thought this was one of Brady’s best games. Played really smart in his own zone and made plays through neutral zone. Girardi had a good game as well.

    Like

  142. Thought that was a good game. Montreal was desperate for a win and we matched them pretty well. Shootouts are dumb so whatever on the final result. Kinda nice to see Hank and Price playing like …. Hank and Price. Nash was great and the 4th line was terrific. I don’t have a problem with how AV is deploying Buch and Vesey. JT shouldn’t be in the shootout…

    Like

  145. Late to the party…still hate these interconference games with no animosity.
    –
    I voted gnash, mcdonut, and machine…in no particular order.
    HM to couch.

    Like

  147. Good morning, boneheads!
    Pretty good game last night against a desperate opponent.
    4th line was giving Montreal fits all night long. Why? Because they are better than Montreal’s 4th line, and better than any 5-6 D-men that Montreal tried to play against them. How about Claude Julien trying to match Webber against Hayes’ line? This team is very deep upfront, I’ll take Price and the rest of Canadiens in 7 game series anytime.

    Like

  148. Nice to see both teams go for it in OT. Nash had his best game in a while. Surprised he didn’t get a chance in the shootout once the game was over.
    I’d take these guys first round. It’s getting out of hand now with this list of teams they should avoid.

    Liked by 1 person

  150. Ilb,
    If the Canadiens were not from Montreal Canada, I would be all for playing them. But since that are, I don’t want them. To many strange things happen when you play a team from Canada.

    Like

  160. I was actually talking about some olympic hockey game back in 1980… I think they call it
    “the luckiest game on ice” or something like that 🙂

    Like

Leave a comment