Free Agency… It’s Go Time!

NHL free agency opens at noon. Someone get Eric a Life Alert necklace. “HELP, the Rangers signed Nick Bonino to a 5 million a year contract and I can’t get up!”

The Rangers have about $18.5 million in cap space (assuming Klein retires) and have to add the following contracts:

  1. Re-sign Zibanejad and Fast
  2. Backup goaltender
  3. At least one defenseman, should be two, but could go up to three if Klein retires.
  4. Fourth line center
  5. Either a first line center, top six winger, or third line center, depending on how the team wants to deploy Zibanejad, Hayes, and Miller.

Some names that the Rangers have been linked to leading up to free agency are as follows:

  1. Kevin Shattenkirk (sounds unlikely)
  2. Nick Bonino (sounds likely)
  3. Joe Thornton (sounds possible)
  4. Patrick Marleau (sounds possible)
  5. Ondrej Pavelec (sounds likely)

In an ideal scenario, I would offer sheet Parayko at the top end of the Two firsts, a second, and a third round pick love of the RFA compensation scale. I think he’s an absolute stud. But of course, no one ever offer sheets anyone so it’s just a pipe dream.

So what would I like to see this year? The more I think about it, the more I want to sign Thornton and Marleau, while staying away from guys like Bonino and Hanzal. The idea is to retool rather than rebuild. Thornton and Marleau allow our younger players to continue to develop in lower line roles while keeping us competitive. Because of his likely contract, I would avoid Bonino like the plague. Hanzal would be the next Bobby Holik, except he would be a worse player in a hard salary cap.

I’d probably be out on Shattenkirk, not because of him as a player, or because I’d be worried about his contract in a vacuum (considering we will likely have an amnesty buyout to use after year four), but because signing him will prevent us from adding the rest of the pieces I would want to add.

We do, however, still need to add at least one right handed defenseman. I’d suggest trying to go short term on a guy like Cody Franson but that may be unrealistic. If all else fails I’d go very short term on Dennis Wideman or, if he doesn’t retire, Mark Streit. Outside of that, it is going to be ugly, which brings me back to Shattenkirk. We might be better off just biting the bullet and buying him out after year four.  No matter what, we aren’t going to be happy, unless Shattenkirk takes an enormous discount to come to NY, which is very unlikely.

Some depth targets that I’m interested in are Mikhail Grigorenko (about whom I’ve read a lot of good things), Alex Chiasson, Nail Yakupov, Alex Burmistrov, Matt Cullen and Brett Connolly.  Depending on other moves, I would potentially be interested in Radim Vrbata, Sam Gagner. I’d also be interested in Brian Boyle (aka BRAN BOLE), but I think there’s no way he comes back to NY with AV as the coach.

For backup goaltender, I’d run, not walk, away from Pavelec. He is not an NHL goaltender.  I’d rather sign an unknown like JF Berube than sign a known terrible goaltender like Pavelec or Niemi. Ultimately, I think the best bet for a backup goaltender (since the worthwhile UFA targets all seem to be accounted for going elsewhere), would be to trade for one. Carter Hutton, Alex Stalock, Aaron Dell, Peter Mrazek (at 50% retained salary), Louis Domingue, or Jusse Saros are some options there.

***UPDATE*** As per Bob McKenzie, Pavelec to the Rangers is a done deal. It’s not even noon and they’ve already made a huge mistake. As Dan Rosen points out, they will need 10-15 wins from their backup. Pavelec isn’t even good for 15 wins in the AHL.  Someone check on Eric.

See you all on the other side.

554 thoughts on “Free Agency… It’s Go Time!”

  1. I’m VERY happy for Girardi that he’s obviously going to land on his feet and make out very well. But I would’ve bet my house that he was in line for a $1m deal somewhere to be a 6/7.
    So…he lines up with Braydon Coburn? Those two will be a combined minus-800 on the road.

    Like

  2. Could never wish ill on Girardi. Wish he was not going to Squirrely Bowman land though. I have developed a strong dislike for the Tampa franchise. I would sign up for the Thornton/Marleau to brioche the gap, and I would sign up for Cullen to be 4th line C. Problem with that is AV would have him playing top 6 in no time.

    Like

  3. I’m with you JPP. Cmon Spocknkirk – take a little less and be one of those guys who actually wants to build a winner.
    If he signs a 3-year deal he will still go UFA at a point in his career where he can get huge dollars.

    Like

  4. If Cullen plays this year it will be with the Wild. They want him, he is a fan favorite, and his kids can play and watch as many games while going to school.

    He’s at his lake cabin wondering if he wants to play a 20th season, or go out on top. I say he plays for another 2M He still has the wheels and a 57.5% face off win percentage. 19 minutes played in Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Finals.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I’ll say this about the Information Age – it really negates the element of surprise. You know who’s being drafted on the walk to the podium. You know who’s signing where, well before FA opens.

    Like

  6. If we had an opening on the left, I would sign Hunwick like a shot.

    If I’m Shart’s agent, I’m saying “Take the bit money. Lockout in 3 years – you’ll get bought out. THEN you can sign with the Rangers”

    Like

  7. AV can’t bench him any more.

    Elliotte Friedman‏Verified account @FriedgeHNIC 7m

    Adam Clendening, who played w/NYR last season, looking like he’s headed to ARIZ

    Like

  8. With every 35 and over signing the Rangers make, the Stepan trade becomes worse and worse.
    RR2,
    I would be very surprised if the Rangers signed any Dmen ( other than Shatennkirk) they have stated they want to get younger back there, and have quite a few guys knocking on the door.
    Also, Franson sucks.

    Like

  9. Stop with stepan trade being worse and worse. We weren’t winning with him at 4 more yrs at 6.5 with a no move clause. At end of day it’s about a cup nothing else. We’ve seen the rest

    Liked by 1 person

  10. If Tampa is committing second-pair money to Girardi, and already have Stralman, Shattenkirk doesn’t make much sense down there. Especially with Sergachev as a sure fire stud.

    Like

  11. It is about the cup and nothing else. Eliminated in the first round or finishing in 10th place in the conference…no difference.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Weirder things have happened though – Shat is only 28 and a skill player. Just playing devils advocate and not endorsing long term.

    He has two viable choices – go for the 7 and 7 deal, which will likely be his last major contract. If he wants to continue past that, he’s in 1-year land as he’ll be 35. Or he can take a nice 3-4 year deal from us, and hit he market again while still commanding top dollar.

    Like

  13. That’s where you are wrong Alex. If I was about this year, I would be all for Thornton and Marleau. I don’t want any part of those guys, or Shatennkirk and any of the other god awful Dmen people are talking about. When the waived Girardi and traded Stepan, they pulled the plug. Now they are try to put the plug back in. Screw that. Go all in. Trade Nash, trade Zucc. Hand the team over to the young vets.

    Like

  14. Doodie
    Yes, you are correct. Draft position improves.

    Other than that zippo difference and imo unless you get top 3 pick in most draft years, it doesn’t matter.

    Like

  15. BDL

    i don’t think they’re getting the san jose guys.

    I would have sat on girardi for 1 more year to lower the buyout cost and years.

    they are not trading zucc and he would not bring the 1st pair right dman.
    they are not trading nash until deadline – if we’re out of it and i think we will be.

    missing the playoffs one year is not the end of the world.

    the stepan deal is about the future not this year. it was a good deal.

    Like

  16. Doodie
    On your depth forward chart, I like all of them except the last two.

    I’ve also changed my mind on the 2nd Hayes, id take a flyer on him.

    When we traded talbot a couple of years ago many here we mad as hell when we didn’t trade talbot to Florida for Hayes (you can look back and see the posts). He wasn’t great obviously in Boston but that franchise has had some issues the last couple of seasons…I think he’s worth the chance.

    Like

  17. If hanzal is going to Dallas, then I’d try to get Marleau and Thompson to fill centre positions. Thornton I would be a little higher on if it wasn’t for his knee injuries.

    Bonino is the longest stay away from pole as a forward that is available…like a 100 foot pole

    Like

  18. Rangers had to buy out Danny G. If he were still here, AV would have played him first pair minutes all year. Gorton gad to do this to get him away from AV. Same with Stepan.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. This years model

    with or without girardi we’re not making the playoffs this year. I was looking down the road to lower amount and years of buyout.

    Like

  20. Wow some of you guys are going to need Ativan before noon even gets here. These two option of sign people for the sake of signing or just tank the season probably aren’t the ones on the table down at MSG this morning. just sayin..

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Went through the same thing last year. some of us shaved years off our life expectancy stressing the Gerbe, Jooris, Clendening signings. And look how well those worked out! *zing!*

    Liked by 1 person

  22. I think the bigger problem in a encore of B. Boyle is his cap hit will be more than what NYR are willing to pay. On Thorton, I’d be ok with a two year deal as I think he would help the young ones better develop their games and maturity. But I would be surprised if they got him to come here.

    Like

  23. 4 years is the key. 6.9 is more than I wanted to give him but I’m willing to bet the Devils offer made Gorton panic a little. still plenty of cap space and more to come with 7.8 from Nash coming back after this season

    Like

  24. That’s a lot. But y’all have to be happy about term right? He’s worth the money for 4 years.

    Would’ve given him 5 years if he came down to 6.25

    Like

  25. $6.9 is a lot, but 4 years and Nash coming off next year makes it tolerable. If the Rangers have 20% PP success as a result of having someone who can run one, it won’t be a disaster. Look at it another way……….Girardi’s replacement is Kevin Shattenkirk.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Don’t know how I feel about Shattenkirk yet. I started to warm up to the idea when I heard he was willing to take less to come here, but then we gave him 6.9, so I’ll probably end up back to hating it.

    Liked by 1 person

  27. unoffical terms of Pavelec deal 1 year 1.3 million. Turn him into a stud trade him back to Winnipeg for Trouba. Steve Mason the next pariah up there

    Like

  28. The term is HUGE. you overpay for UFA. That’s established. He’s a 5.75-6m player. But chances are he’ll go through the lifetime of his contract with no regression or deterioration of skills. He was kind enough to let us off the hook for 2-3 years where he’d probably be worth half his salary.

    Like

  29. Keep in mind if it’s 4 years 28 mill, yeah that’s a lot of money but he walked away from a reported 42 million dollar offer from Devils could have been 6-7 years. Term is the key. less term= more money. It’s a good job by Rangers @ 4 years

    Like

  30. Frank Seravalli‏Verified account @frank_seravalli

    Talked to Shattenkirk camp. He hasn’t decided where he will sign yet, reports otherwise are premature.

    Like

  31. the clock in my car is set at July 1 2007 for some reason…I know we need 2 centers but I sure hope we’re not going back to the future…
    just say No…
    brought to you by the Drury/Gomez everlasting nightmare committee

    Like

  32. So if the jackets are willing to include a guy like Murray in a duchene deal, how can the rangers not be in on a deal for him?

    Like

  33. I wish Karl Alzner gave the honest answer when asked why he signed in Montreal. “Well guys, they were willing to pay me $1MM more per year, so I decided to come to Montreal.”

    Liked by 1 person

  34. That’ll happen when you sign a goalie that lost his starting job on a non playoff team and then got banished to the minors lol but I like it

    Like

  35. To paraphrase the Movie “War Games”, the only way to win free agent frenzy is not to play. Let Gorton sign a couple of minnows while other teams waste their cap space on the “whales”. Cap space is good to have when teams have to start moving contracts.

    Like

  36. A lot of $$$ to be added here…need to trade one or two before or bridge deals abound

    Nash’s $7.8 comes off next year, but Skjei, Miller, Hayes, Vesey will be RFA’s…

    From brooks twitter

    Like

  37. He tasks me. He tasks me and I shall have him! I’ll chase him ’round the rinks of Toronto and ’round the Arizona Maelstrom and ’round perdition’s flames before I give him up!

    Liked by 1 person

  38. TTSN with the big trade report ….

    1:02pm – We have a trade…relax, it’s not a big one: The Bolts have sent Kristers Gudlevskis to the Islanders in exchange for Carter Verhaeghe.

    Like

  39. Sad to see Boyle go to NJ. I would have paid that number over two to get the versatility. Bonino to me a little high but not absurdly so. Not like they gave him Hayes’ bong.

    Like

  40. Would’ve taken Colin Wilson, absolutely.
    Fowler extension $6.5m for 8. These guys are really picking a great time to set the skilled D market.

    Like

  41. Do the contract extensions signify players not re signing (in sj) and maybe a d man trade (in Anaheim)?

    Like

  42. I probably would have sent a 4th for Colin Wilson if I were Gorton – even though he isn’t really a center. He could play 3rd line wing and allow us to move a forward for a center of d-man.

    FYI – Eric good thing you don’t have TSN on because they are going to be face timing with Del Zotto next.

    Like

  43. Hasn’t Fowler been on the trading block for like 2 years? Where the hell do the cash strapped Ducks get off signing him to that deal? Great ceasar’s ghost!

    Like

  44. There are always going to be a fair number of your low money, low term, low risk signings. Your reclamation projects, youngins, etc. But my feeling is that we’ve seen a lot of the middle of the road guys get a bit too much. Girardi for $3m? Same for Hainsey – a guy I wouldn’t take for $925k. Most backup goalies going in the mid-to-high 2’s. Hanzal almost hitting 5. 36-year old Justin Williams the same. Gagner, Kulikov.
    But agreed – inflation. Combo that with a weak crop…oof.

    Like

  45. We’ve either got a new Pope or I am working my laptop too much because I am getting puffs of white smoke 🙂 Seriously, I have had to reboot a couple of times because of all of the windows I had open.

    Like

  46. It’s the usual supply and demand saga. middle of the pack guys gets overpaid and then teams extend their own players to obnoxious lock out inducing extensions because they know what said players will get once they hit the market. vicious cycle

    Like

  47. Just checking in while I have a second. Thanks to Wicky for all the updates.
    So far all I can say about the signings is yuck! And glad none involved the Rangers. Back to work

    Like

  48. Just checking in while I have a second. Thanks to Wicky for all the updates.
    So far all I can say about the signings is yuck! And glad none involved the Rangers. Back to work

    Like

  49. Getting the feeling we are not coming away with any big ticket items (no returns, no exchanges). Might be the year of the kids, at least until the trade deadline.

    Like

  50. Carp says “damn magnet ads”
    Translation
    I really don’t like you guys and don’t want to interact with you but feel obligated to pop in occasionally and interact

    😉

    Like

  51. He must’ve been weighing this deal+ the childhood dream against 2-3 teams offering him 7-year deals, Possibly with more per year.

    He went for it! That’s gotta count for something in the character department.

    Liked by 2 people

  52. Before today, I was wondering if Shattenkirk would sign for four years at $5.5 million a year. After seeing the Vlasic/Fowler extensions, I never thought he would take less but he did. For that, he gets my praise.

    The problem is who plays with McDonagh and who plays with Shattenkirk? Maybe Smith with Shattenkirk and Skjei with McDonagh – unless you move Skjei for a young-ish right d-man.

    Liked by 1 person

  53. Actually remember that time Dan Boyle left money on the table to play for us?

    At least he walked away with the respect of his teammates and whatnot. Not like those rat bastads Brooks and Cyrgalis!

    Like

  54. But then again – Skjei and Smith sit together in AP Chemistry.

    I don’t love McD and Shat as a pair, but it wouldn’t be insane if it happened.

    Like

  55. Will be interesting to see where Thorton ends up. Also, I’m not sure about De Angermanagement. He could be a (small) chip in a move still to come.

    Like

  56. Now that Shatty is here – look for Holden to be on the move. Makes more sense to have cheaper (and righty) Kampfer as the utility 7.

    Holden will probably get moved for a center. I still think Krüger is a decent target, if Vegas is okay with not taking him on for cap purposes.

    I would’ve given Burmistrov the $900k he got from Vancouver.

    Like

  57. I know a lot of you aren’t keen on Thorton but he probably would have been a positive influence on the kids. Intangibles and all that. And would hardly be the worst guy on skates but price/term oh well.

    Liked by 1 person

  58. DaveB – Will probably see a lot of McD and Shatty together late in games when the Rangers are trailing.

    With Marleau and Thornton out, maybe a Grigorenko as a 2017 version of Grabner and then looking for a faceoff demon for the 4th line (Jay McClement – he is a bot slow but his very strong on draws).

    Liked by 1 person

  59. Assuming Holden gone, 6 million divied up between Ziba and Fast, Puemple on team and last 2 forwards/d-man are low-end (sub-million) salary, Rangers now have about 4.5-5.5 million in cap space. No cap room for T/M.

    Holden traded for lower end 3rd/4th line transitional C? Target a salary dump. Possibility or no? Leaves one center spot open and no, no ones getting a top line center for what’s left so going into this season with Ziba no. 1 and Hayes/Miller/? at 2/3 with Andersson longshot for 3.

    My opinion.

    Like

  60. Much rather see a McDonagh/Shattenkirk pairing than a Skjei/Shattenkirk pairing. As much as Skjei has impressed in his rookie year, he still has a tendency to get the hiccoughs at inopportune times. Can Shattenkirk be any worse defensively over the long haul than Girardi (despite his ‘resurgence’) last year?

    Liked by 1 person

  61. Aneirin
    There were definitely 2 versions of skjeL last season…not so good defencively and lost way too many one on one battles regular season. Then the much better defencively and won a lot more one on one battles in the post season.

    Like

  62. The Cap Friendly does not take into account a Klein retirement so we could have about $11.25 million. Don’t forget they still need a veteran 3rd goalie for Hartford (Jhonas Enroth? Reto Berra?). Better do something before Nashville corners the market in AHL goalies.

    Like

  63. Jim Cerny @JimCerny

    Girardi told me he was on way to pick up son from school in Rye when Gorton called “it was tough to swallow, but I have no bitter feelings”

    ——–
    Girardi swallows.

    Liked by 1 person

  64. Considering Shattenkirk could have gotten a six or seven year deal, he could have left anywhere from $13-$20 million – and that doesn’t factor him getting $7 million per season.

    Like

  65. I’d take a top 4 D of mcdonut, trouba, smith, shattenkirk or mcdonut, Barrie, smith, and shattenkirk over mcdonut, SkjeL, smith, shattenkirk

    Like

  66. I’m not sure about the legitimacy of shattenkirk being a top 4 D, a lot of “experts” say he is a 3rd pair guy 5v5 and a power play specialist. His best stl numbers reflect that assessment.

    Like

  67. No on dealing Skjei. He has the potential to keep putting up Shattenkirk type numbers (40+ pts) and you just paid 6.65 per for that. Find another way to add a center!

    Like

  68. Joe vitale wouldn’t be a bad depth signing. He’d probably cost under 800k. Good insurance if Nieves isn’t ready. Excellent face off man.

    Grigorenko seems like the obvious play now. But only if you can get him for $1.5m tops.

    Brooks Laich might be an interesting reclamation project if he wants to bet on himself. And he’s 34.

    What about Jacob Josefson, lately of the swamp due west of NYC?

    Like

  69. Before we anoint skjeL the next “great” d man, let’s make sure he isn’t del zotto v2.0. He put up offencive numbers but had d zone issues a lot in the regular season (just like del zotto in his first full ranger season).

    No one is saying, including me, he is a terrible player or won’t be a very solid NHL d man in a couple of years, but not a single reason to not include him in a deal that makes the team better in an area of need. Team is good to go with left handed d men with or without skjeL.

    Sell high and he is due for a new contract next year as well.

    Like

  70. Skjei’s offense was surprising to me. He’s a good puck mover, but I wouldn’t Be surprised if he never approaches 40 points ever again. He’s a good modern two-way guy who’ll net you 30 points on the 2nd pair.

    Liked by 1 person

  71. Putting aside the hole on defense you end up with if you trade Skjei for Duchene, Matt is on the final year of a contract that has an AAV of $6 million. So unless you are going to go to about $8 million or so on a longish term deal, then you are trading Skjei for one year of Duchene.

    Skjei for Barrie doesn’t make much sense either unless you are hellbent on getting a righty d-man. Barrie has three years at $5.5 million and Skjei gets a new deal after making $925,000. No reason to eat up the cap space for a smaller player who may or may not be better defensively all because he shoots right-handed.

    Like

  72. Dave
    Grigorenko yes.

    I’d try and move Holden for 3C or 4C help at some point regardless of other moves.

    Like

  73. Well, if Shatty isn’t a top 4 guy all the more reason to keep Skjei. Yes I know that the ROOKIE had an up and down season but that’s called giving him room to learn and grow into a player. I for one want him in the mix. Not a knock on anyone’s opinion just giving mine

    Like

  74. Dave
    I’m am 100% in agreement in your assessment of skjeL. 2nd pair guy good solid all around NHL d man, not the left handed almighty.

    Like

  75. The only problem with getting rid of Holden that leaves Kampfer as the 7th d-man. I am not too comfortable with that, especially because we could use a better defensive d-man as a spare.

    Shatty on NHL Network now.

    Like

  76. If we were out on Shattenkirk, and Sakic offered us Barrie for Skjei straight up – I’d listen. And it would be a tough one…and I’d probably do it tbh.
    Now? Nah. And I doubt Sakic would’ve wanted a straight up deal, being what he’s been asking for in the Duchene talks (and that’s a player that I feel is massively overrated, and will be due a stupid chunk of change soon).

    Like

  77. Unlike DelZ, Skjei is not having his chain yanked by Torts and Sather (yet). You all could be right and he’s a flash in the pan and never matures as a defender. But you guys sound a bit like the NYY of the past trading away their young, erratic pitching talent for the big name dujour and then wondering why the cupboard is bare and they are angry about the deal with the ‘big name’.

    Like

  78. James
    Respectfully, if you think having staal, smith, Holden, skjeL, mcdonut, day, graves for the next 4 years is logical, so be it. No reason to sign shattenkirk at all and deangelo, ruannen, berezgalov, poink etc are all pretty much ahl roster fillers only.

    Like

  79. Well if theyre holding onto Holden then the agenda now should be considering the buyout of Staal or trying to trade him for a bag of pucks. Gotta think that they’ll need between 6-7 for RFA purposes and then still have to find a center if not two

    Like

  80. Beezle
    That’s exactly the point though, with good young lefty D, the cupboard is anything but bare.

    Like

  81. I can live with Shatty for 4yrs, but him & McD should not be the 5v5 pair. Pavelec is trash, good luck shining that turd Benny Allaire. Hank better be healthy next year

    Like

  82. James
    Which is then the next point of you should have bought out lefty staal over righty Girardi regardless of the extra couple of seasons of cap penalty

    Liked by 1 person

  83. Yeah well, Shart is only 28 and in 4 years all the millions he left on the table will catch with him.

    Also, I see you guys are ok with a Skjei type player making 7 million a year. Ok then…

    Like

  84. Beezle – I think Skjei is going to be an excellent defender. I just don’t think his offensive game is going to be a consistent thing. Not that it needs to be – he’s just not that guy. Nor am I saying “he’s not an offensive guy, so get rid of him.” I just happen to, in this particular scenario, like Barrie a lot. But it was purely hypothetical and is no longer a real option.

    Like

  85. The point is that IMHO you hold onto 23 y/o’s who haven’t reached their full potential yet. Especially when they’re making hardly any salary at all. You trade 30 year old injury prone dmen that have lost a step and make 5.7 million dollars a year.

    Like

  86. I believe Berezgalov is going to be a top 6 shut down type defenseman in this league. He and Day are certainly going to make a push if not this year than next. that’s why I’m not really concerned about 7th dmen. I think Staal and Holden should be out of the picture. You’ve then rebuilt the entire blueline from the core team with the exception of the captain. The elimination of Staal and Nash from this team brings you nearly 14 million dollars. that’ s enough for a top center and a top 3 RW that’s younger and healthier.

    Like

  87. C3 he’s probably going to have Staal and Holden on the PP points with Shattenkirk on the wing across from Zucc. I hope he does. Lindy’s waiting in the wings now.

    Liked by 2 people

  88. Thanks Eric for catching my Duchene contract mistake. Puts Skjei-Duchene deal in a different light, but Sakic would want waaay more so it is probably a non-starter. I think people are being a little hard on Pavelec – it isn’t like the Thrashers/Jets have been world beaters during his tenure with the franchise. With that said, would have preferred Niemi at $700,000 to save the fishnagels.

    Liked by 1 person

  89. If skjeL was a righty, I’d be a lot less apt to deal him because of lack of righty D depth in the organization, but he’s a lefty with A LOT of lefty depth in the organization.

    Like

  90. LMAO Dave. Wicky- I see your point about the lefty depth. I just think Skjei has some time before we really see him at full potential. Trade the Ryan Graves’ of the organization if that’s the case. Regardless, I’m starting to trust how Gorton does business. I am interested to see how he solves the problem at center

    Liked by 1 person

  91. James
    I posted my personal opinion of the lefty get rid of chart the other day, so you are well aware of what I would “like” to happen, but to not consider moving skjeL for a right d or top centre upgrade is just poor asset management imo.

    Like

  92. James
    I agree re smith, at this point best option for mcdonut partner.

    Pet jay for me and let her know I am too re skjeL

    Like

  93. So does skjeL get a bridge deal next off season? How much is his contract?

    When is staal moved? Is staal moved? Do the rangers buy out another vet d man in staal next season?

    What do they pay all the rfa forwards next season? Do they all get bridge deals?

    Won’t everyone that is a rfa next season want to start looking for contracts with lockout protection and not bridge deals?

    Like

  94. Just guessing but I’d imagine miller and Vessy will come close to the amount of nash’ salary in their next deals (combined)

    Liked by 1 person

  95. Gorton sand his comments about addressing centre issue via trade and using miller as centre are pretty interesting from the speculation standpoint

    Like

  96. Coos
    You realize the “high level” insider from the organization was the custodian who cleans the chase bridge right?! 😉

    Liked by 1 person

  97. Rangers (Gorton) plays it pretty close to the vest. They weren’t in on Hayes or Vesey, but, they wound up here. Tipping your hand only helps the other players. Still have hole(s) to fill at center. I doubt Paul Carey is the answer. He’ll have to pull another Grabner out of the hat unless they are counting on Anderson to make the team. BTW no one is leaving money on the table to play for the Knicks.

    Like

  98. If they move miller to centre, I would guess it is 3C? With z pack 1 and hayes 2? As it sits right this second, then they need a 4C unless it’s andersson.

    Like

  99. Wick, it always depends on what you’re getting back in return. I’m not saying that he should be untouchable just not the top asset I’d be trying to move. Let’s see what their plan is beyond the Paul Carey signing

    Like

  100. If Miller moves to C you’re instantly deconstructing their best line from last year. Unless Vesey slides into Millers spot on Hayes’ LW with Grabner on the other side. I guess Miller would center Nash

    Like

  101. James
    I couldn’t agree more. It absolutely depends on the return. You certainly do not trade him for a centre like moops or a RD like clendening.

    Quite honestly, the fact that we have to bring up “it depends on the return” (should be pretty freaking obvious to everyone that it depends on the return) is pretty sad.

    Like

  102. Next Mayor of NYC, hopefully a Ranger fan (finally), renames Central Park after our old stalwart top DMan, Brad Park.
    Park will be re-named either Brad Park, Park Park, or Brad Park Park.

    Like

  103. It’s BereGlazov, folks…
    Shatn’kirk deal is a good one, no doubt (particularly on a background of others), addresses the needs of team and he sounded genuine constantly and often talking about his passion for Rangers. It counts. What else to wish?
    I have a feeling that Anderson will make a team coming season and be trusted to center 4th line to begin with.
    …it’s not over yet and I’m not sharing sentiment that Rangers will tank (total bull…) or not making PO.
    There is no bona fide 1st line center on the team and on the market, so, it is up to AV and teamwork to bypass obstacle and it is totally doable. Hope dies last.

    Like

  104. In the article bus stop just put out, he states the rangers might be contemplating an expensive buyout of staal to address their centre issue.

    Like

  105. The kid wanted to play for the Rangers. He’s playing for them. Pretty impressive. I was against them going hard after him, but primarily for his potential contract. Sounds like he went hard after them. He’s a pretty good player, and he’s probably underrated defensively. You can move the puck, you can defend.

    Liked by 2 people

  106. Wicky, yes. If Zibanejad or Fast file for arbitration, NY will have another 48 hr buyout window starting 3 days after the case is either settled, or a player receives an award.

    Like

  107. OMG… we are not going to hear the end of this “Life long dream” thing, are we?

    Listen to his inteview at the beginning. He didn’t have a clue where he was going until the last moment.

    Like

  108. They have 5 young rfa’s next year and the only major contract coming off the books would be Nash. Girardi cap hit goes up by a million, Staal buyout this year would leave another 2.5 million in dead cap space next year so even with a elc contract replacing him we would only save 2 milion on the contract. Plus the next year his dead cap space would increase by a million and his cap would remain on the books for 8 years (depending on lockout). It would be an absolute killer to buy him out this year.

    Liked by 1 person

  109. https://www.nhl.com/stars/news/free-agency-recap/c-290268066

    see how he describes stepan

    “Kevin Shattenkirk, defense, signs four years, $6.65 million per year, New York Rangers

    The Rangers shed themselves of aging veterans Dan Girardi (buyout) and Derek Stepan (trade) and then obtained the top free agent defenseman at a manageable cap hit and even more manageable term. Throw in a couple of young prospects and backup netminder Ondrej Pavelec and pretty good week’s work for GM Jeff Gorton. Great landing spot for Shattenkirk after a disappointing turn in Washington after the trade deadline.

    Like

  110. Staal’s contract shifts from NMC to modified NTC next offseason. A nice bounce back year from him might entice someone to take a flyer on him. maybe you can pick up 50% of his contract and flip him for a low pick or minor leaguer, if he were to become a cap causality. So if his cap hit is $5.7m, that turns into a retained cap hit of $2.85m. If his replacement is, say, Ryan Graves, who has a current cap hit of ~$650k, then that move still saves us $2.2m in cap space, and without the problematic dead space until the year 2525.
    So if this happens, plus Nash and Pavelec coming off the books, we could have $11.3m in cap space for our RFAs. Grabner and Holden (if still around) give us another $3.2m. Add roughly $2m in cap increase, and we’re at $16.5 to resign Vesey, Hayes, Miller and Fast.
    Hopefully at that point one of the young goalies is ready for backup time, Buchnevich is a top-6, and Lisa is ready to break in, amongst others.

    Like

  111. Carp
    Great article. You forgot to mention former ranger Michael Haley going to Florida. 😉

    Like

  112. Ilb
    Thanks for the info. Bus stop mentioned it in his article today and I was curious.

    Like

  113. Dave
    Don’t forget the left handed almighty is also due a new contract after next season

    Like

  114. Still short of a couple of centers..
    Imagine if they signed Bonino? Nashville couldn’t beat so the decided to overpay him. Cervicable 3rd line center, but for over $4M? How about Hanzal? Yuck. Thanks, Mr. Gorton.

    Like

  115. Alex
    I really appreciate all your attention (despite saying nothing different than what others have said) but you’re not my type.

    Like

  116. Reread your posts. You’re the one with the fetish repeated ad nauseum.

    To a large degree I was following the busy day elsewhere. Then when I read the days posts here you have to mention me more than once yet and the left handed dman.

    you have issues. most bullies do.

    Like

  117. i was simply letting others who mention trading skjeL to becareful because you freak out about it and then start throwing little tantrums and calling names.

    Not real tough for everyone to see.

    But it’s ok, keep up your little fetish. Free country.

    Like

  118. Common boys, stop picking each other’s nose… Each of you is quite good in your own way, it’s just a matter of opinions. Don’t mimicking the worst pattern in our country now. Enough of fighting – it is just a game…

    Like

  119. Tough to find something original for you isn’t it lol.

    Perhaps next post you should just start with “I know you are but what am I”

    Like

  120. Dave
    I agree, id imagine he’d want lock out protection (as would I). Seems to be the smart thing players are doing now.

    Like

  121. I wonder how many of easy peasy jimmy vesey, no Doritos, hated, and left handed almighty would accept bridge deals?

    Like

  122. Lol a little too soon Wick. Stop making Opie a victim!
    Would be nice to see a true offensive center between Nash and Vesey. This being the last season of Nash’s contract I assume he’ll finally find magic with a center and have a powerhouse season

    Liked by 1 person

  123. James
    Lol. No such thing as here too long 😉

    Yes, definitely like to see a centre added. I’m at the point now that I’d rather see them add the centre via trade. Not sure of the centres left via free agency but any that might of helped seemed to be gone (some with not so good contracts today) except for maybe Marleau (can I make logical points more than once or is that bad?) who can win draws but at his age his contract would be on the books no matter what so it’s a bit of a risk.

    Like

  124. Step for Lisa
    Step Cap Space for Shatty
    Girardi Cap Space for Smith
    Ranta for Da Angel
    .
    Still need to trade a winger for a center and buy out Staal.
    .

    Like

Leave a comment